Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

79 VR(20 results)

Reports in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Colquhoun-Denvers v Yunghanns79 VR 1

[2025] VSC 840·Barrett AsJ·23 Dec 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria44p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

CostsTaxation — Foreign lawyers retained by party and non-party in respect of defamation proceeding in Victoria — Local lawyers retained as solicitors on record — Foreign lawyers’ fees claimed as disbursement in local lawyers’ bill of costs — Whether disbursement recoverable on taxation — Whether party personally liable for foreign lawyer fees — Whether foreign lawyer fees precluded from recovery by principle of indemnity — Whether non-party the ‘real party’ in proceeding

Legal practitionersRegulation — Scope and form of practice — Provision of legal services by foreign law firm — Whether foreign law firm provided services as principal or as agent of local lawyers — Whether provision of services involved practising foreign law — Whether provision of ‘legal services’ — Whether provision ‘in Australia’ — Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014 (Vic), sch 1 ss 6, 10, 69

Jan v DPP (Cth)79 VR 47

[2025] VSCA 43·Emerton P, Taylor and Boyce JJA·21 Mar 2025·Court of Appeal48p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

Criminal lawAppeal — Sentence — Federal offence of causing a person to enter into a forced marriage — Formulation of sentence — Assessment of moral culpability — Whether consideration of customary law or cultural practice of accused precluded by statute — Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), ss 16A(1), (2A) — Criminal Code (Cth), s 270.7B(1)

Criminal lawAppeal — Sentence — Federal offence of causing a person to enter into a forced marriage — Death of daughter of accused following commission of offence — Whether mitigatory effect on sentence — Imposition of immediate term of imprisonment — Whether sentence manifestly excessive

Words and phrases‘criminal behaviour’

Bechaud v The King79 VR 95

[2025] VSCA 306·Priest, Taylor and Kaye JJA·11 Dec 2025·Court of Appeal26p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

Criminal lawPractice and procedure — Juries — Separation oath — Timing — Oath administered to jury at commencement of trial — Oath not administered proximate to jury’s separation during deliberation — Whether failure to do so a fundamental irregularity — Juries Act 2000 (Vic), s 50, sch 5

Hyland v TAC79 VR 121

[2024] VSC 641·Forbes J·22 Oct 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria19p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

NegligenceTransport accident — Whether motor vehicle an ‘unidentified vehicle’ — Requirement to make reasonable inquiries — Nature and extent of necessary enquiries — Requirement to give notice — Material prejudice — Transport Accident Act 1986 (Vic), s 96

R v Crupi (Ruling No 4)79 VR 140

[2022] VSC 676·Beale J·11 Nov 2022·Supreme Court of Victoria6p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

Criminal lawRestricted evidence — Access — Whether Court empowered to appoint amicus curiae to assist it in determining whether restricted evidence should be released to accused — Whether Court should appoint amicus curiae — Whether amici should have access to restricted evidence — Constitution Act 1975 (Vic), s 85 — Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 (Vic), s 43A

Practice and procedureAmicus curiae — Jurisdiction to appoint — Whether amicus curiae should have access to restricted evidence provided to Court — Major Crime (Investigative Powers) Act 2004 (Vic), s 43A

Paramount Invest Grp PL vs Club Fogolar Furlan Melb79 VR 146

[2025] VSC 90·Croft J·12 Mar 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria36p·Vol 79 VR Pt 1

Landlord and tenantRetail premises lease — Forfeiture for non-payment of rent — Relief against forfeiture — Equitable jurisdiction of the Tribunal — Discretion of VCAT to extend time for compliance with prior self-executing order — Whether Tribunal functus officio — Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic), s 89 — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), ss 98(3), 119, 126, 130, 131

Administrative lawVictorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Original jurisidiction — General procedure — Self-executing orders — Extension of time for compliance with prior order — Whether Tribunal functus officio — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), ss 98(3), 119, 126(2)(a), 130, 131

Barton (a pseudonym) v The King79 VR 182

[2025] VSCA 74·Priest, Boyce and Kaye JJA·11 Apr 2025·Court of Appeal34p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Prosecution opening — Evidence — Failure of complainants to give evidence according with prosecution opening — Trial judge declined to take discrepancy into account — Whether substantial miscarriage of justice

Criminal lawJudicial review — Sexual offending — Order made for sex offender registration for fixed duration — Whether trial judge erred in fixing duration — Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic), ss 11, 34

EvidenceCriminal law — Witness credibility — Failure of witness to give evidence in accordance with prosecutorial opening — Whether absence of evidence a matter to be taken into account in assessment of witness’ credibility and reliability — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 101A, 102, 103

Marrogi v Secretary, Dept JCS79 VR 216

[2026] VSC 4·Harris J·19 Jan 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria38p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

Prisons and prisonersRight to be in open air — Whether access to particular yards gave prisoner time ‘in the open air’ — United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, r 23(1) — Corrections Act 1986 (Vic), s 47(1)(a)

Human rightsRight to privacy — Right to humane treatment when deprived of liberty — Prisoner not permitted to dress in private immediately after strip searches — Whether non-compliance with regulatory requirements for strip searching amounted to unlawful interference with prisoner’s human rights — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 13(a), 22(1), 38(1) — Corrections Regulations 2019 (Vic), r 86(2)(e)

Practice and procedureApplication to re-open case during closing submissions — Plaintiff sought relief in relation to onerous conditions of detention — Evidence of potential relevance to plaintiff’s behaviour in prison emerged after evidentiary case closed — Whether to grant defendants leave to re-open case — Whether feasible to determine some issues in a separate judgment

Dunn v Perpetual Trustee Company Ltd79 VR 254

[2025] VSC 799·Finanzio J·16 Dec 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria39p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

TortsNegligence — Duty of care — Existence — Novel duty — Salient features — Particular property identified as gift for beneficiary under will — Sale of property before testator’s death — Whether attorney acting for testator owed duty of care to beneficiary under will — Content of common law duty of attorney when making decisions on behalf of incapacitated donor — Conflicting or incompatible duties — Inconsistency with relevant legislation — Wills Act 1997 (Vic), ss 21(2), 21B(b) — Powers of Attorney Act 2014 (Vic), ss 21, 63, 116, 121

Kassar v Kee79 VR 293

[2025] VSC 671·K Judd J·31 Oct 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria12p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

DefamationConcerns notice — Excluded corporation — Serious financial loss — Whether concerns notice informed publisher of serious financial loss to corporation — Whether imputations particularised in notice — Whether pleaded imputations substantially the same — Defamation Act 2005 (Vic), ss 9, 10A, 12A, 12B

Words and phrases‘concerns notice’ — ‘serious financial loss’

Copper (Qld) Investment Pte Ltd v Hallion79 VR 305

[2025] VSCA 338·Beach, Walker and Kenny JJA·19 Dec 2025·Court of Appeal18p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

Practice and procedureCosts — Mortgage dispute — Mortgagor alleged mortgagee invalidly appointed receivers — Mortgagee successful at trial but on appeal receivers found to be invalidly appointed — Mortgagee awarded 75 per cent of costs of trial — Contract excluded mortgagee’s liability for ‘attempted’ or ‘purported’ exercise of power under mortgage — Mortgagee rejected offers to compromise claim — Whether mortgagee entitled to costs — Whether costs discretion should be exercised in accordance with terms of contract — Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic), s 24 — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), rr 63.13, 63.26

State Securities v Hallmark Group79 VR 323

[2026] VSC 283·M Osborne J·14 May 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria17p·Vol 79 VR Pt 2

CompaniesWinding up — Leave to proceed against company in liquidation — After appointment of interim receivers to company, director of lessor company purported to cause company to grant lease over premises — Whether lease binding on lessor — Putative tenant seeking to enforce lease — Tenant seeking relief against forfeiture — Whether leave to proceed against lessor should be granted — Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 420, 471B

Yeates (a pseudonym) v The King79 VR 340

[2025] VSCA 288·Emerton P, Taylor and Kidd JJA·26 Nov 2025·Court of Appeal25p·Vol 79 VR Pt 3

Criminal lawInterlocutory appeal — Theft of property — Cryptocurrency — Allegation that applicant dishonestly appropriated Bitcoin belonging to another — Whether Bitcoin ‘property’ for the purposes of theft charge — Whether Bitcoin mere information — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), ss 71–2

Words and phrases‘Bitcoin’ — ‘property’

Melco Resorts (Macau) Ltd v Wu (No 3)79 VR 365

[2025] VSC 725·Connock J·21 Nov 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria25p·Vol 79 VR Pt 3

Practice and procedureEvidence — Witnesses — Letter of request to judicial authority to facilitate audio-visual examination and cross-examination — Witness based in China and subject to travel restrictions — PRC Civil Procedure Law prohibited taking of evidence from a China-based witness without the permission of the competent Chinese authorities — Whether letter of request should be sent — Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), rr 41.01(1)(b), 41.13

Conflict of lawsCivil proceedings — Taking evidence abroad — Witness based in China and subject to travel restrictions — Whether letter of request should be sent — Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), rr 41.01(1)(b), 41.13

DPP (Cth) v XY (a pseudonym)79 VR 390

[2025] VSC 661·Fox J·23 Oct 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria19p·Vol 79 VR Pt 3

Criminal lawAppeal — Commonwealth offences — Sentence of Children’s Court — Whether questions of law be reserved for Court of Appeal — Whether general deterrence applied to sentencing children for federal offences in Children’s Court — Children, Youth and Families Act 2005 (Vic), ss 362, 430VA — Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), s 19B — Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth), ss 68, 79(1)

Brown v Victoria (No 3)79 VR 409

[2025] VSC 765·Harris J·12 Dec 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria150p·Vol 79 VR Pt 3

TortBattery — Lawful justification — Self-defence — Effecting arrest — Use of force by police to effect arrest — Protest — Police deployed oleoresin capsicum foam on protesters — Whether police officers had lawful justification for use of force — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), ss 322K, 322N, 458, 459, 462A — Summary Offences Act 1966 (Vic), s 6

DamagesTort — Non-economic loss — Restriction on recovery — Exception — Whether impacts of oleoresin capsicum foam an ‘injury’ — Whether use of oleoresin capsicum foam an intentional act done with intent to cause injury — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), ss 28LB, 28LC

EvidenceStatus of Victoria Police manuals — Manuals issued by Chief Commissioner of Police — Victoria Police Act 2013 (Vic), ss 60, 61

Human rightsProtection from inhuman or degrading treatment — Freedom of movement — Peaceful assembly — Whether plaintiff had right to seek relief or remedy — Whether police conduct incompatible with human rights — Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 (Vic), ss 10(b), 12, 16(1), 38(1), 39(1) — Victoria Police Act 2013 (Vic), ss 73, 74, 75

Words and phrases‘injury’ — ‘reasonable grounds’

Nicholson v Sheils79 VR 560

[2026] VSC 18·Moore J·2 Feb 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria12p·Vol 79 VR Pt 3

Administration and probateIntestacy — Application for distribution order — Multiple partners of deceased — Deceased survived by estranged spouse and unregistered domestic partner — Claim for entirety of estate — Whether claimant an unregistered domestic partner of deceased at time of death — Whether just and equitable to allocate whole of residuary estate to one partner to exclusion of other — Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic), ss 3(1), 70ZA, 70ZD, 70ZE

Words and phrases‘just and equitable’

Pentridge Village (in liq) v Capital Finance Australia79 VR 572

[2025] VSCA 290·Kennedy, Orr and Richards JJA·27 Nov 2025·Court of Appeal47p·Vol 79 VR Pt 4

Practice and procedureDismissal of proceeding for want of prosecution — Whether primary judge applied correct test — Whether Court obliged to have regard to the efficient conduct of its business, efficient use of its resources, minimisation of delay, and the timely determination of proceedings — Whether inordinate and inexcusable delay — Whether justice of occasion demands dismissal — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 7, 8, 9, 25 — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), r 5.12, ord 24

Downer Utilities Australia v Murra Warra Asset Co79 VR 619

[2026] VSC 48·Croft J·18 Feb 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria39p·Vol 79 VR Pt 4

ArbitrationArbitration agreement — Construction — Parties to contract commencing separate arbitrations before different tribunals — Hybrid arbitration clause providing for arbitration to be ‘conducted by the Resolution Institute in accordance with the ICC Rules of Arbitration’ — Workability of hybrid arbitration clauses — Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal — Whether arbitrator entitled to apply Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle to determine authority to arbitrate — Which of two arbitration proceedings should continue

Ma v Qin79 VR 658

[2026] VSC 21·Attiwill J·2 Feb 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria21p·Vol 79 VR Pt 4

Practice and procedureEvidence — Witnesses — Witness based in China and subject to travel restrictions — PRC Civil Procedure Law prohibited taking of evidence from a China-based witness without permission of competent Chinese authorities — Letter of request to judicial authority to facilitate audio-visual examination and cross-examination — Whether letter of request should be sent — Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), rr 41.01(1)(b), 41.13

Conflict of lawsCivil proceedings — Taking evidence abroad — Witness based in China and subject to travel restrictions — Whether letter of request should be sent — Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2025 (Vic), rr 41.01(1)(b), 41.13