Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

75 VR(14 results)

Reports in this volume of the Victorian Reports

Tanah Merah Vic Pty Ltd v Owners’ Corp75 VR 1

[2021] VSCA 72·Beach and Osborn JJA, Stynes AJA·26 Mar 2021·Court of Appeal61p·Vol 75 VR Pt 1

Building contractsStatutory warranties — Breach by builder of warranties — Use of non-compliant cladding on exterior of building — Claim by owners against builder — Whether claim apportionable — Whether claim against builder a claim for failure to take reasonable care — Claim by owners against other parties including consultants to builder — Whether concurrent wrongdoers — Building Code of Australia, cl C1.12 — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), ss 24AF, 24AH, 24AI — Building Act 1993 (Vic), s 16

NegligenceProfessional services — Peer professional opinion — Whether opinion unreasonable — Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic), s 59

Words and phrases‘bonded laminated materials’ — ‘laminate’

Movel (pseudonym) v The King75 VR 62

[2024] VSCA 183·Priest, Niall and Orr JJA·26 Aug 2024·Court of Appeal76p·Vol 75 VR Pt 1

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sexual assault of a child under 16 years — Directions to jury — Comments by trial judge during course of directions regarding child witnesses — Whether irregularity — Jury Directions Act 2015 (Vic), s 44N(4)

Criminal lawAppeal — Conviction — Sexual assault of a child under 16 years — Decision by trial judge to permit jury access to recordings of evidence of child complainant — Whether irregularity — Whether fundamental irregularity — Whether substantial miscarriage of justice — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 223

Waldron v O'Callaghan75 VR 138

[2024] VSCA 196·Ferguson CJ, Macaulay JA and Tsalamandris AJA·10 Sept 2024·Court of Appeal26p·Vol 75 VR Pt 1

Limitation of actionsNegligence — Personal injury — Doctor and patient — Whether personal injury claim statute-barred — Point in time at which cause of action ‘discoverable’ — Whether patient had knowledge, or ought to have known, that injury was caused by ‘fault’ of doctor — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27D, 27F

Limitation of actionsExtension of limitation period — Whether extension just and reasonable — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27K, 27L

AppealAppeal from exercise of judicial discretion — Extension of limitation period — Standard of review on appeal — Whether subject to correctness standard

Words and phrases‘date of discoverability’ — ‘fault’

Re Mokbel (No 2)75 VR 164

[2024] VSC 39·Fullerton J·12 Feb 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria21p·Vol 75 VR Pt 2

Criminal lawEvidence — Admissibility — Privilege – Evidence given, or document produced, to a Royal Commission — Use immunity — Use in subsequent proceedings — Scope of immunity — Whether evidence admissible to impugn credibility of witness — Inquiries Act 2014 (Vic), ss 33, 40

Words and phrases‘against the person’ — ‘other proceedings’

Grand Ridge Plantations Pty Ltd v Valuer-General75 VR 185

[2024] VSC 129·Richards J·22 Mar 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria54p·Vol 75 VR Pt 2

Local governmentRating — Valuation — Applicant occupied land as lessee under the Forests Act 1958 (Vic) or licensed to it under the Victorian Plantations Corporation Act 1993 (Vic) — Applicant liable to pay municipal rates on land based on ‘capital improved value’ of land — Whether ‘forest produce’ on land formed part of land for the purposes of assessing ‘capital improved value’ — Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic), s 2(1) — Forests Act 1958 (Vic), ss 4, 51, 52, 80(1), 82 — Victorian Plantations Corporation Act 1993 (Vic), ss 22, 27B

Practice and procedureNature of review and of appeal under ss 22 and 23 of the Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic) — Powers of Court on an appeal under s 23 in respect of a determination under s 21(4) — Valuation of Land Act 1960 (Vic), ss 21(3)(b) and (4), 22, 23, 24, 25(1)

Millsave Holdings Pty Ltd v Connective Group Pty Ltd75 VR 239

[2023] VSCA 326·McLeish, Macaulay, Lyons JJA·18 Dec 2023·Court of Appeal216p·Vol 75 VR Pt 2

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Whether oppression established — Strategy to remove minority shareholder at below market price by applying financial pressure

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Whether oppression established — Directors’ duties — Exercise of powers for improper purpose — Corporate restructure implemented to circumvent minority shareholder’s pre-emptive rights — Corporate restructure and sale of shares deliberately concealed from minority — Majority undertook sale of business and sought court approval for sale — Whether sale done to deprive minority shareholder of relief sought in oppression and derivative proceedings

CorporationsOppression of minority shareholder — Relief — Principles governing relief — Whether trial judge erred in ordering minority buy-out majority — Whether majority buy-out more appropriate

EvidenceAdmissibility — Admissions — Whether claiming confidentiality over a statement was implied admission as to truth of statement — Representation by conduct — Implied representation by silence — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), s 81

Djordjevich v Peter Djeka Pty Ltd75 VR 446

[2024] VSCA 60·McLeish, Walker and Macaulay JJA·11 Apr 2024·Court of Appeal35p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Administrative lawTribunals — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Powers — Functions of Principal Registrar of Tribunal — Co-owned property dispute — Tribunal made orders for sale of co-owned property — Orders empowering Principal Registrar to appoint real estate agent or solicitor if parties could not agree — Orders empowering Principal Registrar to execute any necessary document in the sale where party refused — Whether Tribunal had power to make orders — Whether Principal Registrar permitted to exercise functions conferred by such orders — Property Law Act 1958 (Vic), ss 228, 232 — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 32

Director of Public Prosecutions v HR75 VR 481

[2024] VSC 467·Elliott J·12 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria12p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Courts and judgesOpen courts — Criminal law — Application for proceeding suppression order — Whether an alleged child victim of offence who made no complaint and would not be called as a witness at trial was a ‘complainant’ or ‘witness’ — Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic), ss 1, 3, 17, 18(1)(d), 18(1)(e)

Words and phrases‘complainant’ — ‘witness’

An v Australian Broadcasting Corporation75 VR 493

[2024] VSC 518·Harris J·30 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria43p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Judicial power — Jurisdiction — Whether Australian Broadcasting Corporation is ‘the Commonwealth, or a person ... being sued on behalf of the Commonwealth’ — Whether proceeding in Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal a matter within federal jurisdiction — Whether VCAT has jurisdiction — Constitution, s 75(iii)

Constitutional lawCommonwealth — Judicial power — Jurisdiction — Whether proceeding requiring determination of whether a person is the Commonwealth is a matter ‘arising under [the] Constitution, or involving its interpretation’ — Whether proceeding a matter within federal jurisdiction — Whether VCAT has jurisdiction — Constitution, s 76(i)

Practice and procedureVictorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Whether VCAT has power and duty to determine own jurisdiction — Whether open and appropriate for VCAT to refer question of jurisdiction to Supreme Court — Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic), s 96

Practice and procedureCosts — Appeal costs — Whether referral of questions of law under s 96 of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic) a case stated or special case — Appeal Costs Act 1998 (Vic), s 19

Victorian Building Authority v May21 Pty Ltd75 VR 536

[2024] VSCA 150·Emerton ACJ, Niall and Osborn JJA·28 Jun 2024·Court of Appeal23p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Building contractsStaged building permit — Building permit levy — Estimate of cost of building work for purpose of levy — Matters to which building surveyor may have regard — Whether building surveyor required to estimate cost of building work by reference to specified contract price only — Building Act 1993 (Vic), ss 205G, 205H(1), 205H(1A), 205HA, 205I(2)(a)(i), 205L

Words and phrases‘having regard to’

Re CD75 VR 559

[2024] VSC 456·Richards J·2 Aug 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria13p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Courts and judgesParens patriae or welfare jurisdiction — Child wishing to commence medical treatment for gender dysphoria — Family law — Parental consent — Only one parent available to consent, and consenting, to treatment — Whether sufficient consent — Whether court approval of treatment required — Whether declaration should be made — Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), ss 61B, 61C — Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 (Vic), ss 50, 55, 58

Kostiuk v KH (a pseudonym) (No 2)75 VR 572

[2024] VSC 636·Ginnane J·18 Oct 2024·Supreme Court of Victoria9p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

CostsAppeal costs — Indemnity certificate — Orders of Magistrates’ Court of Victoria striking out application under Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic) — Orders set aside and rehearing ordered — Application for indemnity certificate in respect of costs of appeal — Whether application under Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic) a ‘civil proceeding’ — Appeal Costs Act 1998 (Vic), s 4(1) — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 3 — Criminal Procedure Act 2009 (Vic), s 3 — Sex Offenders Registration Act 2004 (Vic), ss 3, 6, 11

Fei v Hexin75 VR 581

[2024] VSCA 158·Kennedy, Macaulay and Lyons JJA·4 Jul 2024·Court of Appeal11p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Practice and procedureDiscovery — Preliminary discovery — Requirement that there be reasonable cause to believe applicant for preliminary discovery has or may have right to obtain relief — Whether necessary for applicant to identify cause of action said to give rise to right to relief — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 32.05

Oliver Hume Property Funds v CSR75 VR 593

[2024] VSCA 175·Kennedy, Macaulay and Lyons JJA·8 Aug 2024·Court of Appeal25p·Vol 75 VR Pt 4

Stamp dutyTransactions treated as transfer — Relevant acquisition of significant interest in landholder — Liability for duty upon acquisition of interest in landholder — Shares in landholder issued to 18 investors — No single investor acquired an interest in landholder that was of itself significant — Whether investors acquired interests via associated transactions that together amounted to significant interest — Whether landholder assessable for duty — Duties Act 2000 (Vic), ss 3(1), 77, 78

Words and phrases‘relevant acquisition’ — ‘associated transaction’