Browse

View Victorian Reports and Victorian Law Reports by volume number

62 VR(17 results)

Reports in this volume of the Victorian Reports

DPP v Hou62 VR 1

[2020] VSCA 190·Maxwell P, T Forrest and Weinberg JJA·30 Jul 2020·Court of Appeal32p·Vol 62 VR Pt 1

Criminal lawEvidence — Admissions by accused — Caution — Respondents arrested by casino staff and interrogated by staff prior to arrival of police — Failure by casino staff to caution respondents — Admissions by respondents to casino employees and police — Admissions made to casino staff not sought to be led at trial — Judge excluded admissions made to police — Relevant casino staff employed by casino in capacity relating to ‘the security and surveillance of the casino’ — Whether casino staff ‘investigating officials’ for purpose of the Crimes Act 1958 and Evidence Act 2008 — Whether admissions to casino staff illegally or improperly obtained — Whether subsequent admissions to police tainted by casino staff’s conduct — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), ss 458, 464(2), 464A, 464C, 464D, 464F — Casino Control Act 1991 (Vic), ss 1, 37(1)(b), 81 — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 90, 135, 137

Words and phrases‘investigating official’

Trani v Trani (No 3)62 VR 33

[2020] VSC 332·Daly AsJ·15 Jun 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria21p·Vol 62 VR Pt 1

Practice and procedureSet-off — Judgment debts — Where separate judgment debts owing between parties from different proceedings between them — Where each party entitled to costs against the other party in different proceedings — Whether the Court had inherent jurisdiction to set off a judgment debt in one proceeding against judgment debt in other proceeding — Test to be applied

McKechnie v VCAT62 VR 54

[2020] VSC 454·Cavanough J·7 Aug 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria64p·Vol 62 VR Pt 1

Freedom of InformationApplication fee on Freedom of Information request not paid — Whether ‘hardship’ must be determined by the processing agency — Whether request invalid — Whether invalid request founds jurisdiction of Information Commissioner or Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal — Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), s 17

Practice and procedureProceeding dismissed by oral order, not authenticated — Reconsideration of reasons after finding relevant obiter dicta in uncited Court of Appeal decision while preparing written reasons — Whether obiter dicta should be followed — Whether order should be recalled

Mai v Commissioner AFP62 VR 118

[2020] VSCA 38·Tate, McLeish and Hargrave JJA·5 Mar 2020·Court of Appeal29p·Vol 62 VR Pt 1

Judgments, orders and declarationsConfiscation — Suspected proceeds of crime — Restraining order — Application to revoke restraint — Onus — Whether no grounds to make order at time of revocation application — Whether authorised officer held suspicion on reasonable grounds — Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth), ss 18, 19, 42, 329, 330, 338

Words and phrases‘suspicion’ — ‘reasonable grounds’

Anderson v Stonnington City Council62 VR 147

[2020] VSCA 229·Maxwell P, Tate and McLeish JJA·7 Sept 2020·Court of Appeal26p·Vol 62 VR Pt 2

Planning and environmentPlanning scheme — Heritage overlay — Building permit — Planning permit — Accrued rights — Building permits issued prior to introduction of heritage overlay planning control — Whether building permits created accrued right — Lawfulness of development works without planning permit — Whether development works a ‘use’ — Stonnington Planning Scheme, cl 61.05 (now cl 72.06) — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 28(2)(e) — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 6(3)(d)

Statutory interpretationAmendment of subordinate instrument to extend heritage overlay over property while development works in progress — Whether absence of prior planning control constituted an accrued right — Whether development works a ‘use’ — Stonnington Planning Scheme, cl 61.05 (now cl 72.06) — Interpretation of Legislation Act 1984 (Vic), s 28(2)(e) — Planning and Environment Act 1987 (Vic), s 6(3)(d)

AppealCivil — Practice and procedure — Application for leave to appeal from a decision of judge of Trial Division to dismiss appeal on question of law — Application for leave to amend grounds to introduce an issue withdrawn before Tribunal

Words and Phrases‘development’, ‘right’, ‘use’, ‘work’, ‘works’

Chang v Neill62 VR 174

[2019] VSCA 151·Maxwell ACJ, Beach and Kyrou JJA·27 Jun 2019·Court of Appeal39p·Vol 62 VR Pt 2

Administrative LawJudicial review — Duty to inquire — Procedural fairness — Whether by not making inquiries medical panel failed to discharge statutory function or to accord procedural fairness — Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (Vic), div 3 of pt 6

Administrative LawJudicial review — Factual error — When factual error constitutes jurisdictional error — Whether primary judge applied correct principles — Whether no evidence for medical panel’s conclusions — Whether Medical Panel made factual error

Duca v The Queen62 VR 214

[2020] VSCA 209·Maxwell P, Priest and T Forrest JJA·21 Aug 2020·Court of Appeal20p·Vol 62 VR Pt 2

Criminal LawCriminal procedure — Alternative charges — Murder — Statutory murder — Common law murder — Jury returned verdict of guilty of statutory murder after unable to reach verdict on common law murder — Whether charge of statutory murder an available alternative to charge of murder contrary to common law — Whether statutory murder a separate and distinct offence from common law murder — Appropriateness of practice of pleading both murder and statutory murder as separate charges on indictment — Crimes Act 1958 (Vic), s 3A

RCTC v WCB62 VR 234

[2020] VSCA 328·Beach, Kaye and Osborn JJA·18 Dec 2020·Court of appeal47p·Vol 62 VR Pt 2

ContractDeed of settlement — Bar to further claims — Claim for damages for sexual abuse — Subsequent legislative amendment removing relevant barriers to actions — Commencement of further proceeding — Whether ‘just and reasonable’ to allow further proceeding — Relevant factors — Amount of settlement sum — Lapse of time in issuing proceeding — Setting aside a previously concluded settlement arrangement — Unfair prejudice to defendant — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), ss 27QD, 27QE

Statutory interpretationDetermining purpose and effect of legislative amendments — Clear and unambiguous terms — Consideration of historical context of legislation — Consideration of extrinsic materials — Retroactive effect of legislation — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), div 2 of pt IIA — Limitation of Actions (Child Abuse) Act 2015 (Vic), s 4 — Legal Identity of Defendants (Organisational Child Abuse) Act 2018 (Vic), ss 5, 7 — Children Legislation Amendment Act 2019 (Vic), s 32

Words and phrases‘just and reasonable’

Avery v Manno62 VR 281

[2020] VSC 605·Derham AsJ·21 Sept 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria26p·Vol 62 VR Pt 2

Administration and probateAdministration of estate — Application for judicial advice by executor — Prospective proceedings — Joint tenancy — Severance — Unregistered transfers of land — Where executor intended to lead further evidence in support of application — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), r 54.02

Practice and procedureTrusts and trustees — Application for judicial advice — Disputed facts — Application for summary dismissal — Whether application for advice lacked real prospect of success — Whether application for advice an abuse of process — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), ss 7, 8, 62, 64 — Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015 (Vic), rr 23.01, 54.02

Elliott v Lindholm62 VR 307

[2020] VSCA 260·McLeish, T Forrest and Weinberg JJA·2 Oct 2020·Court of Appeal30p·Vol 62 VR Pt 3

Courts and judgesJudge — Bias — Apprehended bias — Recusal application — Refusal to recuse — Statements by Court as to whether legal practitioner had breached overarching obligations — Joinder of legal practitioner as party to proceeding on Court’s own motion — Whether basis for joinder gave rise to apprehended bias — Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic), s 29(2)(b)

Legal practitionersDuty to Court — Obligation of candour — Privilege against self-incrimination — Relationship between principles — Where Court required legal practitioner to give ‘full and frank’ explanation of conduct in affidavit — Whether Court could compel legal practitioner to give evidence — Court’s supervisory jurisdiction — Whether within jurisdiction

CoINVEST Ltd v Citywide Service Solutions Pty Ltd62 VR 337

[2020] VSC 190·Niall JA·21 Apr 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria22p·Vol 62 VR Pt 3

Statutory interpretationWhether entity an ‘employer’ — Whether entity a ‘public statutory body constituted under the law’ of Victoria — Rules of Construction Industry Long Service Leave Fund — Practice and procedure — Whether appeal raised a question of law — Whether error of law material — Construction Industry Long Service Leave Act 1997 (Vic), s 10

Words and phrases‘employer’ — ‘public statutory body constituted under the law’

CSR Ltd v Amaca Pty Ltd62 VR 359

[2016] VSCA 320·Maxwell P, Beach and Kaye JJA·16 Dec 2016·Court of Appeal88p·Vol 62 VR Pt 3

TortContribution — Manufacturers and suppliers of asbestos thermal insulation — Findings of asbestos exposure and causation dependent on inferences drawn from facts of general application — Whether exposure and causation established

EvidenceExceptions to hearsay — First-hand hearsay — Whether statements made to doctors by unavailable witnesses admissible to prove asbestos exposure — Revival of memory — Reading aloud parts of document — Evidence Act 2008 (Vic), ss 32(3), 63(2), 136 and 192(2)

Limitation of ActionsTorts committed before and after 31 December 1971 — Limitation of Actions Act 1958 (Vic), s 5(1)(d) — Wrongs Act 1972 (Vic), ss 3, 24(4)

EquityContribution — Partners — Coordinate liabilities — Whether equitable contribution subsumed by statutory provisions providing for contribution between tortfeasors — Whether equitable contribution only available in cases where no statutory right of contribution available — Defences — Whether defence of laches available to defeat action commenced within statutory time limit applied by analogy

Octavius Securities & Investments Pty Ltd v Zerbe62 VR 447

[2020] VSCA 279·Tate, Sifris, Osborn JJA·11 Nov 2020·Court of Appeal13p·Vol 62 VR Pt 4

Judgments, orders and declarationsEnforcement — Charging order — Respondent judgment debtor a beneficiary of discretionary trust of which company was trustee — Applicant sought charging order over shares in trustee company — Where shares had only nominal value — Whether shares had any value beyond their nominal value — Whether shares in trustee amenable to a charging order — County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 (Vic), r 73.02

Harris v Victorian Electoral Commission62 VR 460

[2020] VSC 676·Richards J·14 Oct 2020·Supreme Court of Victoria30p·Vol 62 VR Pt 4

ElectionsVictoria — Political parties — Public funding — Political parties in coalition — Single group voting tickets for Coalition (Liberal and National parties) candidates in multi-member Legislative Council regions — Public funding entitlement under Electoral Act 2002 (Vic) paid to Liberal Party in respect of combined group voting tickets — Proposed payment by Liberal Party to National Party pursuant to coalition agreement — Whether payment ‘gift’ and ‘political donation’ under Electoral Act 2002 (Vic) pt 12 — Whether payment ‘consideration in money or money’s worth’ — Whether payment for inadequate consideration — Electoral Act 2002 (Vic), ss 69A, 69B, 151, 206(1), 207F, 211, 212

Words and Phrases‘gift’, ‘political donation’, ‘consideration’

Brown v The Queen62 VR 491

[2020] VSCA 212·Maxwell P, Niall, T Forrest, Emerton and Osborn JJA·25 Aug 2020·Court of Appeal23p·Vol 62 VR Pt 4

Criminal lawSentencing — Impairment of mental functioning — Severe personality disorder — Sentencing judge constrained by authority from applying Verdins principles — Whether personality disorders can engage Verdins principles — Expert evidence — Causal link with offending — Moral culpability reduced

Sentencing Hearings: Expert Reports on Mental Functioning of Offenders62 VR 514

Supreme Court of Victoria14p·Vol 62 VR Pt 4

Mandie v Memart Nominees62 VR 528

[2020] VSCA 281·Tate, Niall and Emerton JJA·13 Nov 2020·Court of Appeal67p·Vol 62 VR Pt 4

TrustsFamily discretionary trust — Beneficiaries and objects — Disclaimer of interests in trust deed — Disclaimer by special beneficiaries — Impact on rights and interests of disclaiming individuals’ children — Doctrine of acceleration — Whether impact of disclaimer by interest holder the same as death of interest holder for purposes of doctrine

TrustsFamily discretionary trust — Beneficiaries and objects — Trustee’s power of exclusion — Removal of certain family members as general beneficiaries under trust — Whether exercise of power invalid — Whether exclusion beyond power or for improper purpose

Practice and procedurePleadings — Amendment — Application for leave to amend during trial — Where issue sought to be pleaded would have been unavoidable at trial — Whether refusal of leave a miscarriage of discretion