H.P. BRADY PTY. LTD. v. KIRSCH

[1936] VLR 44·MARTIN J.
[1936] VLR 44
1936 VLR 44
H.P. BRADY PTY. LTD. v. KIRSCH Supreme Court of Victoria MARTIN J. 28 November 1935 ArbitrationAction on building contractArbitration clauseDefendant unaware of clause when proceedings commencedApplication for stayArbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5 .

Three weeks after service of the writ in an action on a building contract, after appearance had been entered and further particulars of the statement of claim indorsed on the writ had been asked for and delivered, the defendant’s solicitors learned for the first time that the contract contained an arbitration clause. The defendant immediately gave notice that he desired the matters in dispute referred to arbitration. On a summons by the defendant to stay proceedings in the action, under sec. 5 of the Arbitration Act 1928—

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1936] VLR 44

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account