MANNINGHAM CITY COUNCIL v DURA (AUSTRALIA) CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD

3 VR 13·Winneke P, Phillips and Buchanan JJA
[1999] 3 VR 13
MANNINGHAM CITY COUNCIL v DURA (AUSTRALIA) CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA - COURT OF APPEAL Winneke P, Phillips and Buchanan JJA 17 June, 01 October 1999 [1999] VSCA 0158 Arbitration and awardsBuilding contractStaying proceedingsClause providing for arbitration or litigationWhether an “arbitration agreement”Election by one party of litigationWhether arbitration agreement brought to an endDiscretion to order stay of proceedingsWhether predisposition in favour of arbitration Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167) ss. 4, 53(1)..

Clause 13.01 of a building contract provided that a notice of dispute from one party to the other was a condition precedent to the commencement of proceedings, whether by litigation or arbitration. Clause 13.03 provided that a party wishing to commence proceedings, whether by litigation or arbitration, must deliver a further notice after a period of negotiation as required by cl. 13.02. Clause 13.04 provided that a party giving a notice under cl. 13.03 who wished to refer the dispute to arbitration must take certain steps, including lodging a deposit as security for the costs of arbitration.

  • (a)that there is no sufficient reason why the matter should not be referred to arbitration in accordance with the agreement

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1999] 3 VR 13

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account