Browse

Catchwords are the way in which we classify reports into a consistent taxonomy.

ARBITRATION(84 results)

Reports matching this catchword classification

MIXNER v. BLAIR1 VLR (L) 191

BARRY, FELLOWS, and STEPHEN, JJ.·6 Sept 1875·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law5p·Vol 1 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationMoney claims — Award — General balance.

IN RE ARMSTRONG AND CULLEY4 VLR (L) 178

Coram, STAWELL, C.J., and BARRY, J.·30 Jul 1878·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law11p·Vol 4 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationReferring back award — Affidavit of some arbitrators that they were misled — Service — Appeal to Privy Council — Amount at issue.

IN RE BACKHAUS5 VLR (L) 184

Coram, STAWELL, C.J., BARRY, J., and STEPHEN, J.·16 Jul 1879·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law4p·Vol 5 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationProviso for reference, in lease — No appointment in writing of arbitrator.

IN RE FOWLER AND SINNOTT5 VLR (L) 320

STAWELL, C.J., and BARRY, J.·10 Sept 1879·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law8p·Vol 5 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationMisconduct of umpire — Setting aside award — Communicating with witness in absence of opposite party — Affidavit of umpire as to what passed.

BROOKS v. M’PHERSON8 VLR (L) 154

PER CURIAM.·4 Jul 1882·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law4p·Vol 8 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationDamages — Costs — Referring back award.

IN THE MATTER OF HUSBANDS AND HUSBANDS10 VLR (L) 208

PER CURIAM HIGINBOTHAM, WILLIAMS, and HOLROYD, JJ. .·4 Sept 1884·Supreme Court of Victoria, at Law6p·Vol 10 VLR (L) Pt 1

ArbitrationAward not dealing with all matters submitted — Practice — "The Judicature Act 1883" (No. 761), sec. 13 — Order 64, Rule 14 — 9 & 10 Will. III., c. 15, sec. 2 — Setting aside an award — Terms — Sittings of Full Court — Costs.

IN RE MAYOR &C. OF SANDHURST12 VLR 682

PER CURIAM HIGINBOTHAM, C.J., WILLIAMS and KERFERD, JJ. .·14 Oct 1886·Supreme Court of Victoria (Full Court)10p·Vol 12 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationDisqualification of arbitrator by reason of interest — Waiver of objection — Act 24 Vict., No. 102, ss. 28, 66, and 67 — "Terms and Conditions" — "Price."

GLENNY v. THE EGLINTON LAND CO. LIMITED17 VLR 676

HIGINBOTHAM, C.J., A’BECKETT, and MOLESWORTH, JJ.·11 Aug 1891·Supreme Court of Victoria (Full Court)4p·Vol 17 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward made by two out of three arbitrators — Reception of affidavit made by barrister who acted as arbitrator.

BUCKLEY v. THE BOARD OF LAND AND WORKS19 VLR 522

HOLROYD, A’BECKETT and HOOD, JJ.·16 Nov 1893·Supreme Court of Victoria (Full Court)5p·Vol 19 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward — Award a nullity — Admissibility of affidavits — Practice.

FALKINGHAM v. THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS21 VLR 9

HODGES, WILLIAMS, HOLROYD, and HOOD, JJ.·8 May 1895·Supreme Court of Victoria (Full Court)13p·Vol 21 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward — Action upon award — Jurisdiction of arbitrators — Bulk sum award not severable — Award void for inclusion of non-referable item.

FALKINGHAM v. THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS23 VLR 408

MADDEN, C.J.·16 Nov 1897·Supreme Court of Victoria14p·Vol 23 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationRailway contract — Action on award — Finding of arbitrators, conclusive in absence of fraud — Penalties, deduction of — Costs — Interest.

WATSON v. THE BOARD OF LAND AND WORKS23 VLR 421

HODGES, J.·2 Dec 1897·Supreme Court of Victoria8p·Vol 23 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationBulk sum award — Non-referable items — Invalidity of award.

FALKINGHAM v. THE VICTORIAN RAILWAYS COMMISSIONERS24 VLR 4

WILLIAMS, HOLROYD, and HODGES, JJ.·31 Mar 1898·Supreme Court of Victoria (Full Court)8p·Vol 24 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationRailway contract — Penalties for delay, deduction of — Action on award — Award bad in part — Non-referable items, consideration of by arbitrators.

IN RE O’FARRELL26 VLR 195

HOOD, J.·30 Jul 1900·Supreme Court of Victoria2p·Vol 26 VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationEnforcement of award — Submission made a rule of Court — Appointment of arbitrator.

IN RE FREEMAN v. KEMPSTERVLR 394

A’BECKETT, J.·30 Aug 1909·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1909] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationSubmission to — Bankruptcy of one of the parties — Revocation by other party of authority of arbitrator appointed by bankrupt — Necessity of obtaining leave of Court therefor — Incorporation of laws of Victoria in submission — Supreme Court Act 1890 (No. 1142), ss. 141, 160.

IN RE BENNETT BROTHERSVLR 51

MADDEN, C.J.·2 Feb 1910·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1910] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward — Discovery of material evidence after publication of award — Want of diligence on part of party in whose favour evidence is — Referring back award — Amendment of award.

MATTER OF ARBITRATION BETWEEN BLAND BROS. AND COUNCIL OF BOROUGH OF INGLEWOODVLR 467

HOOD, J., HODGES, J., CUSSEN, J.·6 Jun 1918·Supreme Court of Victoria10p·Vol [1918] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward — Jurisdiction — Injury to land — Flooding — Overflow of water channel — Statutory remedy — Acts — Omissions — Water Act 1915 (No. 2747), ss. 253, 259, 260, 263, 264, 265 — Water Act 1916 (No. 2852), s. 6 — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), ss. 12, 19.

HARRISONS RAMSAY PTY. LTD. v. CRESPINVLR 643

SCHUTT, J.·3 Nov 1921·Supreme Court of Victoria5p·Vol [1921] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationContract — Action on — Counterclaim based on prior contract — Arbitration clause — Application to stay counterclaim — Jurisdiction — Discretion — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 5.

IN RE AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE PRESIDENT, ETC., OF THE SHIRE OF WODONGA AND CARRVLR 56

SCHUTT, J.·3 Dec 1923·Supreme Court of Victoria9p·Vol [1924] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationStatement of case by arbitrators — "Question of law arising in the course of the reference" — Arbitrators asked to state case before giving award — Refusal of arbitrators — Jurisdiction of Court to direct arbitrators to state case on question of law — Exercise of Court's discretion — Questions arising incidentally during the reference — Questions in dispute before the reference — Qualification of arbitrators — Form of questions to be asked in special case settled — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 19.

CARR v. SHIRE OF WODONGAVLR 286

[Coram KNOX, C.J., ISAACS, RICH AND STARKE, JJ.]·29 May 1924·In the High Court of Australia8p·Vol [1924] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationStatement of case by arbitrators — "Question of law arising in the course of the reference" — Arbitrators asked to state case before giving award — Refusal of arbitrators — Jurisdiction of Court to direct arbitrators to state case on question of law — Exercise of Court's discretion — Questions arising incidentally during the reference — Questions in dispute before the reference — Form of questions to be asked in special case settled — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 19.

DRIVER v. THE WAR SERVICE HOMES COMMISSIONERVLR 515

CUSSEN, A.-C.J., McARTHUR J., and WEIGALL, A.-J.·26 Sept 1924·Supreme Court of Victoria20p·Vol [1924] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationSpecial case — Application to Court to direct statement of — "Matter of law arising in the course of the reference," what is — Conflict of evidence — No evidence — Function of arbitrators — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 19.

DRIVER v. THE WAR SERVICE HOMES COMMISSIONERVLR 535

CUSSEN, A.-C.J., McARTHUR, J., and WEIGALL, A.J.·26 Sept 1924·Supreme Court of Victoria20p·Vol [1924] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationSpecial case stated — Three arbitrators, majority to decide — Facts stated found by two only — Contract — Supply of timber — Evidence — Construction of written document — Ambiguity — Extrinsic evidence, admissibility of — "Current market price" — Meaning of — Course of dealing where meaning of contract doubtful.

LATHAM v. FOSTER’S AUSTRALIAN FIBRES LTD.VLR 427

DIXON, A.-J.·15 Aug 1926·Supreme Court of Victoria8p·Vol [1926] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationSubmission — Award — Findings of arbitrator — Findings unsupported by or against the weight of evidence — Acceptance without objection of evidence not upon oath — No ground for setting aside award — General reference of all matters arising out of contract — Interpretation of contract by arbitrator conclusive — Parol variation of submission in writing — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 12 (2).

THE MELBOURNE HARBOUR TRUST COMMISSIONERS v. HANCOCKVLR 418

Knox, C.J., Isaacs, Gavan Duffy, Rich and Starke, JJ.·9 Jun 1927·In the High Court of Australia25p·Vol [1927] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAward — Construction of contract submitted to arbitrator — Question of law for his determination — Integral part of matter submitted — Finality of award — Motion to set aside award — Form of award — Reasons attached — No special case.

SWANSON v. BOARD OF LAND AND WORKSVLR 283

Mann, J.·2 Apr 1928·Supreme Court of Victoria8p·Vol [1928] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationBuilding contract — Disputes to be referred to architect employed by a party — No action to be brought unless award obtained — Award a condition precedent to action — Disqualification of arbitrator.

O’SHAUGHNESSY v. QUICK SERVICE STATIONS LTD.VLR 405

IRVINE, C.J.·28 Aug 1928·Supreme Court of Victoria7p·Vol [1928] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationLease — Arbitration clause — Dispute or difference between lessor and lessee to be referred to arbitration — Assignment of lease — Consent of lessor to assignment withheld — Whether matters in dispute or difference should be referred to arbitration — Discretion of Judge — Stay of proceedings — Sufficient reason to the contrary — Lessor and lessee summons — Application for adjournment of — Whether a "step in the proceedings" — Arbitration Act 1915 (No. 2614), s. 5 — Conveyancing Act 1915 (No. 2633), ss. 24, 25.

IN RE AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN MODERN ROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PTY. LTD.VLR 214

MANN J.·25 May 1931·Supreme Court of Victoria7p·Vol [1931] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationArbitrator — Appointed arbitrator disqualified by interest — "Incapable of acting" — Application to Court for appointment of arbitrator — Disqualification negatived by contract — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 6 (b).

MODERN ROAD CONSTRUCTION CO. PTY. LTD. v. THE MELBOURNE HARBOR TRUST COMMISSIONERSVLR 275

Cussen A.C.J., Lowe J., Wasley A.J.·14 Apr 1932·Supreme Court of Victoria19p·Vol [1932] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationContract — Arbitration clause — Reference to party's engineer — Breach of contract — Repudiation — Action — Stay of proceedings — Dispute involving examination of engineer — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

ARBUTHNOT SAWMILLS PTY. LTD. v. THOMASVLR 1

LOWE J.·31 Oct 1934·Supreme Court of Victoria5p·Vol [1935] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationSubmission — Stay of proceedings — Court of Petty Sessions — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

H.P. BRADY PTY. LTD. v. KIRSCHVLR 44

MARTIN J.·28 Nov 1935·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1936] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationAction on building contract — Arbitration clause — Defendant unaware of clause when proceedings commenced — Application for stay — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

NICHOLLS v. HEADLANDVLR 151

MACFARLAN J.·31 Mar 1938·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1938] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationInsurance policy containing arbitration clause — Condition in policy requiring notification of impending prosecution — Failure to give notice — Prejudice of insurer — Action for damages against insured — Insurer joined as third party — Application by insurer for stay of proceedings — Refusal of stay — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5 — Instruments (Insurance Contracts) Act 1936 (No. 4464), sec. 3.

IN RE AN ARBITRATION BETWEEN MITCHELL AND BRASSEYVLR 371

MANN C.J.·27 Jun 1939·Supreme Court of Victoria6p·Vol [1939] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationBuilding contract — Certificate of practical completion — Dispute — Reference to arbitration — Whether arbitrators may determine whether works practically completed.

GOGOLL v. GENERAL ACCIDENT FIRE AND LIFE ASSURANCE CORPORATION LTD.VLR 455

O’BRYAN J.·13 Aug 1940·Supreme Court of Victoria6p·Vol [1940] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationInsurance policy containing arbitration clause — Whether policy extended — Whether difference "arising out of policy" — Stay of proceedings — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

WOODMASON v. TRANSPORT & GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.VLR 114

FULL COURT (Mann C.J., Lowe and Martin JJ.).·6 Mar 1941·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1941] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationInsurance policy containing arbitration clause — Whether policy renewed — Whether difference concerning "subsistence" of policy — Stay of proceedings — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

EATON v. EATONVLR 233

SHOLL J.·27 Apr 1950·Supreme Court of Victoria9p·Vol [1950] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationApplication for stay of proceedings — Whether dispute unsuitable for arbitrator to try — Onus of proving — Claim for dissolution of partnership — Claim for receiver — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

HARDY v. JUDSONVLR 274

LOWE, J.·18 Feb 1955·Supreme Court of Victoria2p·Vol [1955] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationArbitration clause in contract — Application to stay proceedings — To be made before taking steps in proceedings — Filing affidavit in reply to summons for final judgment — And asking leave to defend — Constitutes taking a step — Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), sec. 5.

VARLEY v. SPATTVLR 403

HERRING C.J. read the following judgment·25 May 1955·Supreme Court of Victoria10p·Vol [1955] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationBuilding contract — Enforcement of award — Grounds for setting aside — Answers in award not final — Extraneous matters, not raised in questions submitted, dealt with in answers — Denial of justice — Evidence of material witness taken in absence and without knowledge of parties — Evidence part of basis for award made.

ContractBuilding contract — Alteration to plans — Prior consent in writing of surveyor not obtained — Illegality — Uniform Building Regulations.

IN RE DAVIS AND BROWN’S ARBITRATIONVLR 717

SHOLL J. read the following judgment·20 Aug 1956·Supreme Court of Victoria5p·Vol [1956] VLR Pt 1

ArbitrationReference by consent of parties out of Court — Award — Application to set aside or remit — Whether time limit therefor — Rules of the Supreme Court 1938, Order LIX, r. 2.

In Re DAVIS AND BROWN'S ARBITRATION (No 2)VR 127

SHOLL, J·24 Sept 1956·12p·

Arbitration - Reference by consent out of Court - Award made - Agreement to re-open reference - Power in arbitration to make new or amended award - Time limit for making award - Waiver by conduct - Written agreement to refer future differences - Appointment and reference made by parol - Unnecessary to sign written submission - Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), s3, s10, s13.

In re LEWIS CONSTRUCTION CO PTY LTD AND FEDERATION INSURANCE LTD's ARBITRATIONVR 162

HERRING, CJ·13 Aug 1957·3p·

Arbitration - Submission to two arbitrators - One refusing to act - No power in court to fill vacancy - Arbitration Act 1928 (No. 3637), s6(b).

BUILDING AND ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTIONS (AUST) LTD v PROPERTY SECURITIES No 1 PTY LTDVR 673

PAPE, J·29 Apr 1960·11p·

Arbitration - Summons for final judgment - Application for adjournment by defendant to give notice requiring submission to arbitration - Summons by defendant to stay proceedings pending submission to arbitration - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s5 - Defendant entitled to ask for arbitration where he repudiates contract before action brought - Printed form of contract - Typewritten insertions - Contract - Construction.

Re SMITH AND ATHERTON'S ARBITRATIONVR 9

GAVAN DUFFY, J·23 Aug 1960·3p·

Arbitration - Reference by consent of parties out of court - Award - Application to set aside award - Whether time limit therefor - Jurisdiction to extend time to apply - Circumstances in which extension of time granted - Rules of the Supreme Court, O.LIX, r2.

RESERVOIR HOTEL PTY LTD v E S CLEMENTSON (VICTORIA) PTY LTDVR 721

ADAM, J·23 May 1961·8p·

Arbitration - Building contract - Arbitration clause - Scott v Avery form - Dispute to be submitted to arbitration - Meaning of "dispute" - Judgment in default of defence - Setting aside judgment - Right to stay of action pending submission of dispute to arbitration as ground for setting aside judgment - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s5.

ALBECK v ABY - CECIL MANUFACTURING CO PTY LTDVR 342

O'BRYAN, DEAN AND SMITH, JJ·24 Nov 1964·19p·

Arbitration - Dispute as to profit of business - submission to arbitration - Action to enforce award for umpire - Whether plaintiff entitled under original contract or award - Agreement not to prosecute any action based on award - Public policy - Attempt to oust jurisdiction of court - Re-appointment of umpire - Validity of appointment of umpire - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200).

GWJ BLACKMAN and CO SA v OLIVER DAVEY GLASS CO PTY LTD and NOEL SEARLE PTY LTDVR 570

WINNEKE, CJ, ADAM AND GILLARD, JJ·10 Jun 1966·13p·

Arbitration - Stay of proceedings - Third-party proceedings - Contract - Belgian law applicable to dispute between fourth and fifth parties - Court more suitable - Discretion to stay proceedings - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s5.

AMERICAN REAL ESTATE PTY LTD v ABBATANGELOVR 362

GOWANS, J·17 Feb 1965·2p·

Arbitration - Action arising from a building dispute - Parties willing to have matters in dispute referred for report by an architect - Appropriate form of order referring matter for report and giving directions - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s14, s16.

CARRACHER v COLONIAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY LTDVR 605

GILLARD, J·26 Apr 1968·8p·

Arbitration - Stay of proceedings - Insurance contract - Operation of Commonwealth and State Acts - Insurance - Life insurance - Accident insurance - Life policy - Additional policy with further benefit upon accidental death - Continuous disability insurance contract - Arbitration clause - Life Insurance Act 1945-1961 (Com.) - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s5 - Instruments Act 1958 (No. 6279), s28, s29.

WADSLEY v CITY MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY LTDVR 140

MENHENNITT, J·31 Jul 1970·7p·

Life assurance - Policy - Interpretation - Provision for reference to arbitration in the event of any dispute between company and "the assured" in relation to annexure - Meaning of "assured" considered - Policy to wife on the life of her husband - Policy referring to wife as the "member" and husband as the "assured" - Whether ordinary meaning of the word "assured" displaced - Whether arbitration clause applicable to claimant wife.

Arbitration - Stay of proceedings - Insurance contract - Life insurance - Annexure to policy providing for additional death by accident benefit - Scott v Avery arbitration clause contained in annexure - Whether arbitration condition excluded by s28 of the Instruments Act 1958 - Operation of Commonwealth and State Acts - Continuous disability insurance contract - Whether contract of more than one year's duration - Life Insurance Act 1945-1965 (Com.), s4, s8(1) - Instruments Act 1958 (No. 6279), s28, s29(3).

GIANFRIDDO v GARRA CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTDVR 289

SMITH, J·25 Sept 1970·4p·

Arbitration - Error on face of award - Application to set aside award - Reference to contract in award - Incorporation in award - Principles applicable.

AJZNER v CARTONLUX PTY LTDVR 919

PAPE, J·5 Jul 1972·16p·

Landlord and tenant - Lease for fixed term - Option for extension of term - Rent for extended period to be determined by arbitrator in default of agreement - Arbitrator to be appointed by secretary of Real Estate and Stock Institute - Submission by parties requesting appointment of valuer to determine rent - Valuer appointed and determines rent - Parties bound by determination of valuer.

Arbitration - Provision in lease for appointment of arbitrator to determine rent for extended term - Whether reference by parties to arbitrator or valuer - Whether to conduct judicial inquiry or determine according to his skill and experience - Whether necessary to conduct hearing and call evidence - Open reference - Arbitration Act 1958 (No.6200).

PRIDHAM HOLDINGS LIMITED v SMORGON CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES PTY LTDVR 231

MENHENNITT, J·20 Jun 1973·11p·

Arbitration - Ruling by arbitrator on question of law - Whether arbitrator to be directed to state special case for opinion of Court - Relevant considerations - Irreversible and prejudicial consequences to party applying if arbitrator follows proposed course and ruling erroneous - Whether party applying has exhausted courses open to prevent arbitrator following proposed course - Whether arbitrator can be so directed where question of law is whole reference - Arbitrator a lawyer of standing - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s19.

WC THOMAS and SONS PTY LTD v BUNGE (AUST) PTY LTDVR 615

STARKE, J·15 May 1974·5p·

Arbitration - Stay of proceedings - Third-party proceedings - Contract - Indian law applicable to dispute between defendant and third party - Discretion to stay proceedings - Victorian court more suitable - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s5.

WC THOMAS and SONS PTY LTD v BUNCE (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD; GENERAL PRODUCE COMPANY, THIRD PARTYVR 801

GILLARD, NEWTON and NORRIS, JJ·18 Apr 1975·8p·

Arbitration - Stay of proceedings - Contract - Third party proceedings - Indian law applicable in commercial dispute between plaintiff and defendant and between defendant and third party - Arbitration clause nominating Indian tribunal as arbitrator - Application for stay by third party - Relevant considerations - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200) s5.

BERBETTE PTY LTD v HANSAVR 385

ANDERSON, J·14 Nov 1975·7p·

Arbitration - Costs - Right of successful party to costs - Arbitrator's discretion as to costs - Reasons must exist to justify departure from the general rule.

D PHILLIPS CONSTRUCTIONS (VIC) PTY LTD v RF MULLAVEY AND JF ADAMSVR 171

MURRAY, J·14 Dec 1979·6p·

Arbitration - Motion to set aside award in relation to costs - Whether Court limited to considering what appears on the face of the award - Whether error must appear on the face of the award - Arbitrators's exercise of discretion.

ROBERT SALZER CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD v BARLIN-SCOTT AIR CONDITIONING PTY LTDVR 545

YOUNG, CJ MCINERNEY and FULLAGAR, JJ·26 Apr 1979·16p·

Arbitration - Arbitrators appointed by private agreement - Whether arbitrators so appointed empowered to award interest - Supreme Court Act 1958 (No. 6387), s78(1) - Arbitration Act 1958 (No. 6200), s14, s15 and s16.

DAMPSKIBSSELSKABET TORM A/S v AUSTRALIAN WHEAT BOARDVR 145

LUSH, MURPHY and O'BRYAN, JJ·6 Jun 1980·10p·

Arbitration - Question of law arising - Reference to Court by way of case stated - Award made in conformity with decision of the Court - Power to set aside the award for error of law on its face if the decision of the Court incorrect.

Shipping - Charterparty - Construction - Exception - "Strike of workmen essential to berthing of vessel or to loading of cargo" - Storemen refusing to load vessel if it berthed unassisted during tug operators' strike - Whether charterer exempted from demurrage during strike of tug operators.

NATHAN v MJF CONSTRUCTIONSVR 75

NICHOLSON J·25 May 1985·15p·

Practice and procedure - Discovery and inspection of documents - Documents in possession of person not a party to action - Notes of arbitrators and tape recording of arbitration proceedings - Power of court to order discovery and inspection - Source of court's power - Matters to be considered in exercising power - Rules of the Supreme Court, O. 37, r7 - Evidence Act 1958 (No. 6246), s13.

Arbitration - Application to set aside award - Arbitrators' notes of proceedings - Court's power to compel production and inspection of arbitrators' notes - Whether notes protected by privilege.

MUIRFIELD PROPERTIES PTY LTD v HANSEN and YUNCKEN PTY LTDVR 615

NATHAN J·11 Nov 1986·10p·

Arbitration - Building contract - Scott v Avery clause - Contract entered into and proceedings for its breach instituted prior to commencement of Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 - Dispute not referred to arbitration - Defence invoking Scott v Avery clause - Whether defence should be struck out - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s3,s55.

Statute - Interpretation - Statute prohibiting invocation of Scott v Avery clause - Retrospective operation of statute - Whether party to contract containing Scott v Avery clause retrospectively divested of contractual right to rely on clause - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s3, s55.

AUSTRALIAN SHIPPING COMMISSION v KOORAGANG CEMENT PTY LTDVR 29

KAYE, MURPHY and TADGELL JJ·25 Feb 1987·10p·

Arbitration - Charterparty - Time bar - Limitation imposed by Hague Rules - Expiry of time limit - Order extending time - Whether cause of action revived - Exercise of discretion to extend time - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s48.

COSTAIN AUSTRALIA LTD v FREDERICK W NIELSEN PTY LTDVR 235

MURRAY , GOBBO and TADGELL JJ·26 Jun 1987·5p·

Arbitration - Award - Appeal - Leave to appeal to Supreme Court refused - Leave to appeal from refusal also refused - Jurisdiction of Full Court to entertain applications for leave to appeal - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s38.

KARENLEE NOMINEES PTY LTD v ROBERT SALZER CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTDVR 614

CROCKETT J·19 May 1987·7p·

Arbitration - Award - Leave to appeal from arbitrator's award - Applicable principles - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s38.

MIDECO MANUFACTURING PTY LTD v TAITVR 50

GOBBO J·31 May 1988·9p·

Arbitration - Costs - Offer to compromise by letter - Whether offer of compromise under Rules - Whether O.26 applies to arbitrations - Application to Supreme Court on question of law - Leave to apply - Disputed question of costs - Whether leave should be granted - Whether letter before hearing otherwise admissible on costs - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s34(5A), s38(4)(b), s38(5)(a), s39(1)(a), s39(2) - Rules of Supreme Court, O.26.

STANNARD v SPERWAY CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTDVR 673

BROOKING J·2 Oct 1989·10p·

Arbitration - Removal of arbitrator - Misconduct - Arbitrator informed of offer of compromise during hearing - Refusal to disqualify - Whether refusal constituted misconduct, incompetence or unsuitability - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s4, s44.

KUDEWEH v T and J KELLEHER BUILDERS PTY LTDVR 701

ORMISTON J·9 Dec 1988·19p·

Arbitration - Notice of dispute - Service - Course of "ordinary mail" - Deemed receipt - Appointment of arbitrator by third party - Requisites of valid nomination - Assent of nominee - Notification to nominee and parties.

KORIN v McINNESVR 723

BROOKING J·10 Oct 1989·8p·

Arbitration - Removal of arbitrator - Incompetence - Unsuitability - Arbitrator indisposed during hearing - Request that arbitrator stand down - Refusal of request - Whether arbitrator incompetent - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s4, s44(c).

MELVILLE HOMES PTY LTD v PRIME CERAMICS SERVICES PTY LTD2 VR 211

SORTHWELL J·12 Jul 1990·3p·

Arbitration - Consolidation of two arbitrations - Application of "all the parties" - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s. 26.

BRYARLEY PTY LTD v FLETCHER and Another2 VR 272

TADGELL J·13 Feb 1992·7p·

Arbitration - Costs - Whether arbitrator has discretion as to applicable scale of costs - Arbitrator awarding costs to be taxed - Whether Supreme Court has jurisdiction to intercept order for taxed costs - Taxation of costs - Whether Taxing Master has discretion as to applicable scale of costs - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s34, s47, s49.

Practice and procedure - Costs - Jurisdictional limits - Costs penalty rules for inappropriate jurisdiction - Applicability of costs penalty rules to arbitration proceedings - Supreme Court Rules, r63.24, r63.25.

LEIGHTON CONTRACTORS PTY PTD v KILPATRICK GREEN PTY LTD2 VR 505

FULLAGAR, MCGARVIE and ASHLEY JJ·22 Oct 1991·17p·

Arbitration - Award - Leave to appeal - Principles - "Nema" guidelines - Damages - Interest - Hungerford principle - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No 10167), s31, s32, s38

ESSO AUSTRALIA RESOURCES LTD and ORS v PLOWMAN and ORS1 VR 1

BROOKING , TADGELL and SMITH JJ·17 May 1993·40p·

Arbitration - Contract - Implied terms - Whether implied term that hearing be in private - Legal incident to particular class of contract - Custom of country - Broad equitable considerations - Whether implied term that information disclosed in arbitration is confidential - Difficulty in formulating general rule and exceptions - Declaration - Whether declaration appropriate - Declaration in vague or general terms - Declaration based on hypothetical facts - Stay of proceedings - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No 10167), s14, s26, s47, s53.

NAURU PHOSPHATE ROYALTIES TRUST v MATTHEW HALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS PTY LTD and ANOR2 VR 386

SMITH J·5 Aug 1992·25p·

Arbitration - Removal of arbitrator - Misconduct - Denial of natural justice - Refusal of arbitrator to order further and better particulars - Total loss claim - Particulars of nexus between events and time/money consequences - Abuse of process - Court's power to order further and better particulars - Relevant considerations - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No. 10167), s4, s44, s47.

AED Oil Ltd and Another v Puffin FPSO Ltd27 VR 22

[2010] VSCA 37·(Court of Appeal) (2010) Buchanan and Bongiorno JJA and Croft AJA·5 Mar 2010·9p·

Arbitration - Agreement - Construction - Dispute resolution clause - Submission to arbitration - Exceptions - Urgent relief - Counterclaim - Stay - "Urgent interlocutory or declaratory relief" - International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 7 8 - Commercial Arbitration Act 1984 (No 10167).

Flint Ink NZ Ltd v Huhtamaki Australia Pty Ltd and Another44 VR 64

[2014] VSCA 166·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Warren CJ, Nettle and Mandie JJA·6 Aug 2014·50p·

Arbitration - Agreement - Applicability of arbitration clause - Third party proceeding - Claimant not party to arbitration agreement - Related company - Refusal of stay application - Whether dispute capable of settlement by arbitration - Appeal allowed - Conditions - "Claiming through or under a party" - International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 7(2) 7(4)

Subway Systems Australia Pty Ltd v Ireland and Another46 VR 49

[2014] VSCA 142·(Court of Appeal) (2014) Maxwell P, Beach JA and Kyrou AJA·1 Jul 2014·29p·

Arbitration - Franchise agreement - Arbitration clause - Staying court proceedings - Action brought in Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal - Whether court includes tribunal - "Court before which an action is brought" - Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (No 50) s 8.

Statutory interpretation - Legislative purpose - Statute implementing international agreement - UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration - Definition in model law not re-enacted - Consistency with language and purpose of statute - Extrinsic materials.

Robotunits Pty Ltd v Mennel49 VR 323

[2015] VSC 268·Croft J·22 Jun 2015·Supreme Court of Victoria33p·Vol 49 VR Pt 3

ArbitrationStay of Court proceedings — Referral to arbitration – Partial referral — Matters for determination in Court proceeding within scope of arbitration agreement — Determination of a `matter' — Whether `matter' for determination must be sustainable or have reasonable prospects of success — Whether `matter' within scope of arbitration agreement — Whether matters under Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) capable of settlement by arbitration — International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) s 7(2)(b)

Words and Phrases`Capable of settlement by arbitration'

Gutnick v Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Ltd49 VR 732

[2016] VSCA 5·Warren CJ, Santamaria and Beach JJA·9 Feb 2016·Court of Appeal14p·Vol 49 VR Pt 6

ArbitrationForeign award — Application to enforce foreign award — Public policy — Whether enforcement of award would give rise to double recovery — Court's inherent and equitable powers in aid of proper execution — International Commercial Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) ss 8(2), (7)(b)

EquityRescission — Agreements for purchase of shares — Arbitral award declaring agreements rescinded and ordering repayment of purchase price — No orders requiring retransfer of purchased shares — Whether purchasers' rescission effective to reconvey equitable title to shares — Whether necessary that arbitral award required rescinding purchasers to reconvey legal title

Blanalko Pty Ltd v Lysaght Building Solutions Pty Ltd52 VR 198

[2017] VSC 97·Croft J·10 Mar 2017·Supreme Court of Victoria27p·Vol 52 VR Pt 2

ArbitrationArbitration award — Award failing to determine all issues — Whether a final award — Whether arbitrator’s mandate terminated — Whether award may be set aside — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) ss 32, 34(2)(a)(iii)

ArbitrationArbitration agreement — Application to stay court proceedings — Whether agreement inoperative or incapable of being performed — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) s 8(1)

Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd v BMD Constructions Pty Ltd52 VR 267

[2017] VSC 382·Croft J·30 Jun 2017·Supreme Court of Victoria5p·Vol 52 VR Pt 2

ArbitrationSubpoena — Domestic arbitration — Application for subpoena to non-party to attend for examination before an arbitral tribunal — Whether reasonable grounds required for the issue of subpoena — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), ss 27, 27A

Lin Tiger v Platinum Construction57 VR 576

[2018] VSC 221·Croft J·10 May 2018·Supreme Court of Victoria19p·Vol 57 VR Pt 4

ArbitrationJurisdiction — Competence — Review of arbitrator’s ruling on jurisdiction — Whether rehearing de novo or judicial review of arbitrator’s ruling — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), ss 16(9), 16(11)

Building contractsContract for plastering work — Dispute resolution — Whether arbitration prohibited — Whether domestic building work — Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic), ss 3, 5, 6(2), 14, 54(1)(b) — Domestic Building Contracts Regulations 2017 (Vic), regs 7(e), (g)

Winslow Constructors Pty Ltd v Head, Transport for Victoria64 VR 200

[2021] VSC 74·Riordan J·26 Feb 2021·Supreme Court of Victoria18p·Vol 64 VR Pt 2

ArbitrationAward — Challenge — Costs — Appropriate test to be applied for unmeritorious challenges to arbitral awards — Whether indemnity costs should be the default order in unsuccessful challenges to arbitral awards — Whether a different approach should be adopted by reason of the objects of the Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic) or the International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth) — UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, art 34(2) — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), ss 1AA, 1AC, 34 — International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), ss 2D, 16

CostsArbitration — Challenge to award — Jurisdiction to award indemnity costs — Principles to be applied with respect to unmeritorious claims — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic).

Feldman v Tayar64 VR 429

[2021] VSCA 185·McLeish, Sifris and Kennedy JJA·24 Jun 2021·Court of Appeal21p·Vol 64 VR Pt 3

ArbitrationArbitration agreement — Agreement in writing — Whether arbitration agreement specified ‘in writing’ which disputes to be arbitrated — Where arbitration agreement provided clear mechanism for precise identification of disputes — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), ss 1(3)(b), 4, 7, 35, 36

ArbitrationAward — Reasons — Whether arbitrators failed to give reasons for arbitral award — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), s 31

Factory X v Gorman Services71 VR 403

[2023] VSC 247·Croft J·12 May 2023·Supreme Court of Victoria22p·Vol 71 VR Pt 3

ArbitrationAppeal from decision of arbitrator — Appeal on a question of law — Approach to appeal where arbitrator’s decision turns on question of construction — Commercial Arbitration Act 2011 (Vic), s 34A(3)(c)(i)

Words and phrases‘obviously wrong’

Oil Basins Ltd vs Esso Australia Resources Pty Ltd78 VR 388

[2025] VSC 34·Croft J·13 Feb 2025·Supreme Court of Victoria40p·Vol 78 VR Pt 3

ArbitrationApplication to stay court proceedings — Kompetenz-Kompetenz doctrine — UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration arts 2, 5, 7, 8, 16, 28, 34, 35, 36 — International Arbitration Act 1974 (Cth), ss 7, 16, 39

Downer Utilities Australia v Murra Warra Asset Co79 VR 619

[2026] VSC 48·Croft J·18 Feb 2026·Supreme Court of Victoria39p·Vol 79 VR Pt 4

ArbitrationArbitration agreement — Construction — Parties to contract commencing separate arbitrations before different tribunals — Hybrid arbitration clause providing for arbitration to be ‘conducted by the Resolution Institute in accordance with the ICC Rules of Arbitration’ — Workability of hybrid arbitration clauses — Jurisdiction of arbitral tribunal — Whether arbitrator entitled to apply Kompetenz-Kompetenz principle to determine authority to arbitrate — Which of two arbitration proceedings should continue