FINANCIAL WISDOM LTD v NEWMAN and Others
12 VR 79·Eames and Nettle JJA and Williams AJA
12 VR 79
(a) at a time when a person (in this section called the ‘representative’) is a representative of only one person (in this section called the ‘indemnifying principal’) or of 2 or more persons (in this section called the ‘indemnifying principals’), the representative, whether within or outside this jurisdiction: (i) engages in particular conduct; or (ii) proposes, or represents that the representative proposes, to engage in particular conduct;
(b) another person (in this section called the ‘client’) does, or omits to do, a particular act, whether within or outside this jurisdiction, because the client believes at a particular time in good faith that the representative engaged in, or proposes to engage in, as the case may be, that conduct: (i) on behalf of some person (in this section called the ‘assumed principal’) whether or not identified, or identifiable, at that time by the client; and (ii) in connection with a securities business or investment advice business carried on by the assumed principal; and
(c) it is reasonable to expect that a person in the client’s circumstances would so believe and would do, or omit to do, as the case may be, that act because of
""
Continue Reading This Report
12 VR 79
Best Value
Digital Subscription
$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account