THE STATE OF VICTORIA v THE MASTER BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA

2 VR 121·TADGELL (1), ORMISTON (2) and EAMES (3), JJ
[1995] 2 VR 121
THE STATE OF VICTORIA v THE MASTER BUILDERS' ASSOCIATION OF VICTORIA SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA APPEAL DIVISION TADGELL (1), ORMISTON (2) and EAMES (3), JJ 28-30 June, 1 July, 30 September 1994 Administrative lawPrerogative powersJudicial reviewProcedural fairnessGovernment task forceScheme for elimination of collusive practices in building industryWhether task force acted in performance of a public dutyPublication of "black list of building contractors debarred from tendering for government contractsWhether legitimate expectation of entitlement to tender for and be awarded government contractsLegitimate expectation as to business reputationWhether contractors entitled to procedural fairness before publication of "black listCollusive Practices Act 1965 (No. 7353) s5(3). . The Victorian Government established a non-statutory task force to deal with collusive tendering and other corrupt practices in the building industry. In August 1993 the task force sent 750 Victorian building contractors a letter setting out the terms upon which the Victorian Government would in the future be prepared to deal with contractors. Recipients of the letter had been chosen on the basis that they had tendered for government contracts in the previous six years whether or not there was evidence implicating them in collusive practices. Each contractor was invited to provide a pro forma statutory declaration denying involvement in collusive practices in the previous six years. The statutory declaration left no room for explanation or qualification. Contractors who admitted participation in collusive practices were required to repay the government amounts of money obtained thereby. Contractors were free to challenge the government's claims in court. In September 1993 the task force sent to Victorian Government departments and agencies and to all municipal councils a "black list of names of 240 building contractors who in the task force's assessment had not responded satisfactorily to the August 1993 letter and who, as a result, were not to be allowed to tender for or be awarded government building contracts. The Master Builders' Association of Victoria brought proceedings on behalf of building contractors against the State Government seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against the task force's activities.

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1995] 2 VR 121

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account