Browse

Catchwords are the way in which we classify reports into a consistent taxonomy.

Execution(13 results)

Reports matching this catchword classification

IN THE WILL OF WILKINSONVLR 77

HODGES, J.·18 Feb 1915·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1915] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Probate — Incorporation by reference of document not duly executed — Will leaving property "as per enclosed my last will and testament" — Writing entitled "Last will and testament" on back of will making disposition of property.

IN RE McPHEEVLR 394

SCHUTT, J.·24 Jul 1924·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1924] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Attestation — Will made by testator on printed form — Signed on first and second pages — Attestation only on first page, whether will sufficiently attested — Wills Act 1915 (No. 2749), s. 7.

IN RE GILBERTVLR 662

CUSSEN, J.·19 Nov 1925·Supreme Court of Victoria3p·Vol [1925] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Attestation — Will made by testatrix on printed form — Signed on first and third pages — Second page blank — Attestation only on first page, whether sufficient — Wills Act 1915 (No. 2749), s. 7.

IN RE FERREIRAVLR 90

MANN, J.·10 Mar 1927·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1927] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Signature by testator and two witnesses — No formal attestation clause — Presumption of due execution — Wills Act 1915 (No. 2749), s. 7.

IN RE DYTRYCHVLR 144

McArthur, J., Macfarlan, J., Wasley, A.-J.·2 Feb 1928·Supreme Court of Victoria7p·Vol [1928] VLR Pt 1

Administration and ProbateWill — Execution — Position of signature — Signature indorsed on document — Whether at or opposite to end — Intention to give effect by signature to writing as will — Wills Act 1915 (No. 2749), ss. 7, 8.

IN RE SKELTONVLR 323

LOWE, J.·21 Aug 1930·Supreme Court of Victoria3p·Vol [1930] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Acknowledgment — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3808), sec. 7.

IN RE MORGANVLR 191

Irvine C.J., Lowe J. and MacFarlan J.·19 May 1931·Supreme Court of Victoria7p·Vol [1931] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Position of signature — Signature indorsed on document — Intention to give effect by signing to writing as will — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), secs. 7, 8.

IN RE BELFRAGEVLR 357

Cussen A.C.J., Mann J., MacFarlan J.·20 Jun 1932·Supreme Court of Victoria5p·Vol [1932] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Signature at end of dispositive provisions and above appointment of executors — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), secs. 7, 8.

IN RE HEITSCHVLR 338

LOWE J.·20 Jul 1933·Supreme Court of Victoria4p·Vol [1933] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — First page alone executed — Incorporation of other pages — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), sec. 7.

IN RE MALEVLR 318

LOWE J.·11 Oct 1934·Supreme Court of Victoria3p·Vol [1934] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Signature — Part of an initial letter only — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), sec. 7.

IN THE WILL OF MORGANVLR 335

DEAN J.·1 May 1950·Supreme Court of Victoria6p·Vol [1950] VLR Pt 1

Administration and ProbateWill — Execution — Whether acknowledgment by testator of his signature "in the presence of" both witnesses required — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), sec. 7.

IN RE BLADENVLR 82

SHOLL J.·17 Sept 1951·Supreme Court of Victoria7p·Vol [1952] VLR Pt 1

Administration and probateWill — Execution — Signature by testator and two witnesses — Presumption of due execution — Conflict of testimony by witnesses to will — When presumption becomes operative — Wills Act 1928 (No. 3803), sec. 7.

RE HANCOCK, DECEASEDVR 620

MCINERNEY, J·30 Jul 1968·4p·

Administration and probate - Will - Execution - Whether attesting witnesses to will required to sign in the presence of each other - Whether testatrix should acknowledge her signature in the presence of both witnesses, both being present at the same time - Wills Act 1958 (No. 6416), s7 - Administration and Probate Act 1958 (No. 6191), s12(2)(b).