AIKEN v. AIKEN

[1941] VLR 124·MANN C.J.
[1941] VLR 124
1941 VLR 124
AIKEN v. AIKEN Supreme Court of Victoria MANN C.J. 21 February 1941 ActionCompromise of actionAction struck outDefendant failing to carry out terms of compromiseReinstatement of actionDefendant directed to perform specifically terms of compromiseSupreme Court Act 1928 (No. 3783), sec. 61 (7) .

Where an action had been compromised and by consent of the parties struck out by the Judge before whom it was listed for hearing, and the defendant subsequently failed to carry out the terms of the compromise, an order was made reinstating the case as an action for trial and directing the defendant to perform specifically the terms of the agreement embodying the compromise.

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1941] VLR 124

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account