CHIARELLA v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION

2 VR 103·MURPHY, FULLAGAR and O'BRYAN JJ
[1992] 2 VR 103
CHIARELLA v ACCIDENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA APPEAL DIVISION MURPHY, FULLAGAR and O'BRYAN JJ 29 April, 17 September 1991
[1992] 2 VR 103
Accident compensationStatutory schemeApplication out of timeAmending Act giving discretion to extend timeProcedural amendmentWhether amendment applicable to claimAccident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191), s56(8), s117(6)Accident Compensation (General Amendment) Act 1989 (No 64), s31(4), s32(1), s33(1).. Prior to 5 March 1990, s117(6) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985 allowed an employee dissatisfied with a recommendation of the Accident Compensation Tribunal's arbitrator 60 days in which to apply to the tribunal for a determination. The Act contained no provision for extending the 60 day period. On 5 March 1990, certain amendments to the Act came into operation by which, inter alia, a new s56(8) was inserted into the Act empowering the tribunal to extend the time for lodging an application, or to allow an application to be lodged out of time. However, s32(1) of the amending Act provided that any question or matter referred to the tribunal before March 1990 should be determined in accordance with the Act as in force before that date. The applicant's claim was disputed by the Accident Compensation Commission and referred to the tribunal on 4 January 1990. On 23 March 1990, the arbitrator made a recommendation unfavourable to the applicant, but the applicant did not apply to the tribunal within 60 days of that recommendation. The applicant then claimed that s56(8) allowed the tribunal to accept a late application from him.

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1992] 2 VR 103

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account