ACCIDENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION v TILLEY AND OTHER

2 VR 499·MARKS, SOUTHWELL and HEDIGAN JJ
[1992] 2 VR 499
ACCIDENT COMPENSATION COMMISSION v TILLEY AND OTHER SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA APPEAL DIVISION MARKS, SOUTHWELL and HEDIGAN JJ 19, 29 May 1992
[1992] 2 VR 499
Accident compensationGradual process injurybefore and after appointed dayEntitlement to compensation for entire periodAccident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191), s82(1), (6). . S82 of the Accident Compensation Act 1985 provides: "(1) If there is caused to a worker an injury arising out of or in the course of any employment the worker shall be entitled to compensation in accordance with this Act. . . . (6) Where a worker suffers an injury which occurs by way of a gradual process over time and which is due to the nature of employment in which the worker was employed at any time before notice of the injury was given, the worker or the worker's dependants shall be entitled to compensation under this Act as if the injury were an injury arising out of or in the course of employment." Each respondent suffered a gradual process injury, being progressive degenerative disease of body joints. The degenerative process caused disability both before and after 31 August 1985 (the "appointed day" on which the relevant parts of the Accident Compensation Act came into operation). The disability was contributed to by work performed by each respondent both before and after the appointed day. The Accident Compensation Tribunal assessed compensation upon the basis that the whole of the injury was suffered in the course of employment after the appointed day. Upon appeal by the Accident Compensation Commission.

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1992] 2 VR 499

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account