MAYNE NICKLESS LTD v MACKINTOSH

[1989] VR 878·MURPHY, GOBBO and PHILLIPS JJ
[1989] VR 878
MAYNE NICKLESS LTD v MACKINTOSH SUPREME COURT OF VICTORIA FULL COURT MURPHY, GOBBO and PHILLIPS JJ 16-17, 21 November 1988, 17 February 1989
[1989] VR 878
Accident compensationConstructionIndependent contractor"Deemed worker""Deemed employer""Relevant contract"Earnings"Pre-injury average weekly earnings"Ascertainment where "deemed" worker"Partial incapacity"Entitlement to compensationOnus of proofAccident Compensation Act 1985 (No 10191), s9, s94, s95, s113. . M, a truck driver, owned his own truck and drove it under an arrangement with SP. He was required by SP to wear, and he wore, a uniform; the prime mover of his truck was painted in SP's colours; he carried an "Employee's Identification" card and, until the accident in January 1986, he worked exclusively for SP. He paid for his own petrol and running costs, was paid monthly for work carried out, without deduction of tax, and had no entitlement to sick or holiday pay. There was no contract in writing. In October 1985, M began operating a second truck driven by another driver in work for SP and another company. In January 1986 the respondent purchased a third vehicle which was used in work for SP. On 16 January 1986, M was injured whilst performing duties for SP. The Accident Compensation Tribunal determined that by reason of s9 of the Accident Compensation Act 1985, the respondent was deemed to be a worker, and that he should be awarded weekly payments of compensation, of an amount to be calculated having regard to his average weekly earnings. On appeal to the Full Court:

""

Continue Reading This Report

[1989] VR 878

One-off Purchase

$25
This report only
Permanent access
PDF download
Best Value

Digital Subscription

$45/mo
or $450/yrSAVE $90
All reports included
Unlimited access
Cancel anytime
Don't have an account? Create Account